Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:08

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Stock futures rise after S&P 500 notches a fresh record high: Live updates - CNBC
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
SpaceX adds 26 satellites to its Starlink constellation with launch from California - Space
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Can a bride cheat on her groom at a wedding?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Which MacBook should you buy in 2025? - 9to5Mac
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Are there any free methods to remove only the vocals (not music) from an MP4 file?